> On Feb 10, 2016, at 8:05 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> I'm not a big fan of this. Those calls are by the very definition
> harmless, so they aggrevate the existing problem of stupid annotation.

The issue is that the annotation's current diagnostic is pretty nonspecific and 
therefore not useful to programmers who don't know what it means in that 
specific case. Adding parameters to specify a specific, useful diagnostic (and 
maybe deprecating the argument-less use), or forking this into two more 
specific annotations, should resolve things.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to