NoQ added a comment. In D66042#1627193 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042#1627193>, @alexfh wrote:
> Should this be different with clang and this patch? Nope. Moreover, this patch in fact introduces the same problem in scan-build :) In D66042#1627193 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042#1627193>, @alexfh wrote: > But without this patch clang seems to have the same two ANALYZE log lines > regardless of whether I enable `core` checkers or not Yup, it seems as if clang-tidy enables `core` as long as at least one Static Analyzer checker is enabled (even if it's path-insensitive). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
