Szelethus marked an inline comment as done.
Szelethus added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/track-control-dependency-conditions.cpp:469-471
+extern void __assert_fail (__const char *__assertion, __const char *__file,
+                           unsigned int __line, __const char *__function)
+__attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> NoQ wrote:
> > Szelethus wrote:
> > > NoQ wrote:
> > > > I'm pretty sure you can define this function only once.
> > > Note that it is in a namespace!
> > I mean, why is it in a namespace? Why not just define it once for the whole 
> > file? It's not like you're gonna be trying out different variants of 
> > `__assert_fail`.
> Yea, good point.
Actually, I kinda like how a single namespace is a single test case, an 
all-in-one package. Do you insist?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D65287/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D65287



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to