ilya-biryukov added a comment.
Tried the suggested approach and ran into the issue described above.
Either we make the diagnostics less useful ('did you mean foo::bar?' turns into
'unresolved identifier bar'; without mentioning the correction) or we even
stop providing some corrections in addition to that.
On the other hand, I agree that over time we will start emitting too many
diagnostics at the end of TU if keep the patch as is. That is not a good way.
There should be a better option for emitting the uncorrected diagnostics closer
to where they are produced, but I don't have a good idea on what it should be
off the top of my head. Ideas warmly welcome.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64799/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64799
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
