ilya-biryukov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp:307
+TEST(SemanticHighlighting, HighlightingDiffer) {
+ struct {
----------------
Can we test this in a more direct manner by specifying:
1. annotated input for old highlightings,
2. annotated input for new highlightings,
3. the expected diff?
The resulting tests don't have to be real C++ then, allowing to express what
we're testing in a more direct manner.
```
{/*Old*/ "$Variable[[a]]", /*New*/ "$Class[[a]]", /*Diff*/ "{{/*line */0,
"$Class[[a]]"}}
```
It also seems that the contents of the lines could even be checked
automatically (they should be equal to the corresponding line from `/*New*/`,
right?), that leaves us with even simpler inputs:
```
{/*Old*/ "$Variable[[a]]", /*New*/ "$Class[[a]]", /*DiffLines*/ "{0}}
```
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/SemanticHighlightingTests.cpp:391
+ for (const auto &Test : TestCases) {
+ checkDiffedHighlights(Test.OldCode, Test.NewCode);
+ }
----------------
NIT: remove braces
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64475/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64475
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
