MyDeveloperDay added a comment.
I appreciate what you've done to make this patch less duplicated code..but now
you've almost got to the point where being able to control it all via
configuration.
I'm with @rdwampler I think you should be able to extend the include
categories...and then this becomes a very powerful capability. There are many
people who use clang-format for a "non" standard style source trees, and they
might like to use such a capability themselves without having to inherit from
NetBSD type.
I agree it will be complex, but that is a good justification for adding hard
coded a NetBSD style.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/Format.cpp:1905
+ }
+ ///!!!!!!
llvm::stable_sort(Indices, [&](unsigned LHSI, unsigned RHSI) {
----------------
remove
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
