quantum added a comment. In D64537#1584069 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64537#1584069>, @dschuff wrote:
> Oh, btw, any reason these have to be passive segments? Why can't we just make > them active segments and let the VM initialize them for us? These need to be passive segments so that we can initialize it in different locations in linear memory for every thread. If we had multiple memories, TLS could have been implemented as a separate linear memory, but we are stuck with `malloc`ing and initializing for now. In D64537#1584067 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D64537#1584067>, @dschuff wrote: > If there's any chance this TLS ABI could be useful for WASI (I don't know if > there's been any WASI work on threads yet, but it seems like there's no > reason it couldn't be), then we should start a doc in tool-conventions for > it. If not then we should get it behind the emscripten OS in LLVM. (and > document it anyway; either in tool-conventions or somewhere in the emscripten > site). Documenting this in tool-conventions is planned. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D64537/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D64537 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
