nridge marked an inline comment as done.
nridge added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/test/type-hierarchy.test:1
# RUN: clangd -lit-test < %s | FileCheck -strict-whitespace %s
{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"method":"initialize","params":{"processId":123,"rootPath":"clangd","capabilities":{},"trace":"off"}}
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Please add a unit test to TypeHierarchyTests.
>
> I'm on the fence about having a lit test: it's a new LSP method, though the
> binding is pretty simple.
> But features that are **only** covered by lit tests are too painful to
> maintain.
As I've already written the lit test, I think there's little harm in keeping it.
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64308
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
