lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/abseil-faster-strsplit-delimiter.cpp:55
+
+ absl::StrSplit("ABC", R"(A)");
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:25: warning: absl::StrSplit() called with a
string literal consisting of a single character; consider using the character
overload [abseil-faster-strsplit-delimiter]
----------------
zhangxy988 wrote:
> lebedev.ri wrote:
> > Is there a negative test, `absl::StrSplit("ABC", R"(AA)");`?
> > Also what about wide chars? (the second assertion)
> I don't really know how to write a negative test like that.
> This check is only concerned with single character string literal and it
> doesn't support wide char (since `StrSplit` doesn't).
What i'm asking is, those assertions are there just to say "look, i guarantee
those invariants hold here",
or to say "oh no, we shouldn't have ever violated these invariants here"? The
difference being, in former case,
there is some other error checking that prevents those assertions from
triggering; in latter case there is not.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64151/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64151
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
