Thank you so much! Sorry for the inconvencience, I'll be that much more
careful next time :)
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, 21:42 Richard Smith, <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I'll commit the change below once my testing finishes :)
>
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 12:40, Kristóf Umann via cfe-commits <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Noted, thanks! Gabor, could you please fix this?
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, 21:37 Richard Smith, <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> This is in any case the wrong fix. The code *is* wrong, for the reason
>>> this compiler is reporting.
>>>
>>> The correct fix is to declare the explicit specializations in the header
>>> file:
>>>
>>> template <> void CFGDominatorTreeImpl<true>::anchor();
>>> template <> void CFGDominatorTreeImpl<false>::anchor();
>>>
>>> Clang will tell you to do this under -Wundefined-func-template (which we
>>> haven't turned on by default because people get this wrong too often...).
>>>
>>> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 12:29, JF Bastien via cfe-commits <
>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kristof,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like your fix didn’t address all the bots:
>>>>
>>>> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Analysis/Dominators.cpp:14:48:
>>>> error: explicit specialization of 'anchor' after instantiation void
>>>> CFGDominatorTreeImpl</*IsPostDom=*/true>::anchor() {} ^
>>>> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage2-coverage-R/llvm/tools/clang/include/clang/Analysis/Analyses/Dominators.h:225:3:
>>>> note: implicit instantiation first required here
>>>> ControlDependencyCalculator(CFG *cfg) ^
>>>>
>>>> Can you please address the issue?
>>>>
>>>> http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage2-coverage-R/4153/consoleFull
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> JF
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 3, 2019, at 5:06 AM, Kristof Umann via cfe-commits <
>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Author: szelethus
>>>> Date: Wed Jul 3 05:06:10 2019
>>>> New Revision: 365030
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=365030&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Make a buildbot using a buggy gcc happy
>>>>
>>>> When specializing a template in a namespace, it has to be in a namespace
>>>> block, else gcc will get confused. Hopefully this fixes the issue.
>>>>
>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/Dominators.cpp
>>>>
>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/Dominators.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/Dominators.cpp?rev=365030&r1=365029&r2=365030&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/Dominators.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Analysis/Dominators.cpp Wed Jul 3 05:06:10 2019
>>>> @@ -8,10 +8,12 @@
>>>>
>>>> #include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/Dominators.h"
>>>>
>>>> -using namespace clang;
>>>> +namespace clang {
>>>>
>>>> template <>
>>>> -void clang::CFGDominatorTreeImpl</*IsPostDom=*/true>::anchor() {}
>>>> +void CFGDominatorTreeImpl</*IsPostDom=*/true>::anchor() {}
>>>>
>>>> template <>
>>>> -void clang::CFGDominatorTreeImpl</*IsPostDom=*/false>::anchor() {}
>>>> +void CFGDominatorTreeImpl</*IsPostDom=*/false>::anchor() {}
>>>> +
>>>> +} // end of namespace clang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
