rogfer01 added a comment. > As noted in another comment, it's not entirely clear what zero-width bitfield > behaviour to match (see here > <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/issues/99#issuecomment-509233798>) > as GCC seems buggy and the ABI is under-specified. Ideally I'd like to land > this patch and follow-up to adjust the zero-width bitfield behaviour if > necessary once that psABI issue is resolved.
Agreed, I presume the original intent in the psABI was to have C and C++ behave the same. We're siding with gcc in this patch but it should not be difficult to change if the psABI resolves this in favour of g++. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
