jdenny abandoned this revision.
jdenny added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:1596
         << Ty << E->getSourceRange();
+  if (Ty->isRealFloatingType()) {
+    llvm::APFloatBase::Semantics Sem = llvm::APFloatBase::SemanticsToEnum(
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> jdenny wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > jdenny wrote:
> > > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > > jdenny wrote:
> > > > > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > > > > jdenny wrote:
> > > > > > > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Why do we need all this stuff? I think the original code 
> > > > > > > > > works good here, we just need to improve the message.
> > > > > > > > > Why do we need all this stuff? I think the original code 
> > > > > > > > > works good here, we just need to improve the message.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > It seems we've been miscommunicating.  Let's review the 
> > > > > > > > discussion so far, point by point, and I'll show you how I 
> > > > > > > > arrived at this code.  I think the first major point is as 
> > > > > > > > follows.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I asked:
> > > > > > > > > Are you intentionally requiring support for __float128 when 
> > > > > > > > > the source type is 128-bit long double? That seems to mean 
> > > > > > > > > powerpc64le cannot offload to itself.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > You replied:
> > > > > > > > > No, if the host has 128 bit long double, the device must also 
> > > > > > > > > have 128 bit long double. It has nothing to do with the 
> > > > > > > > > float128 type itself.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I thought you were agreeing with my understanding.  That is, 
> > > > > > > > the original code requires `__float128` support even when 
> > > > > > > > 128-bit `long double` is in use.  That's why powerpc64le cannot 
> > > > > > > > offload to itself.  How does the original code require 
> > > > > > > > `__float128`?  It checks 
> > > > > > > > `Context.getTargetInfo().hasFloat128Type()`.  As far as I can 
> > > > > > > > tell, that checks for `__float128` support, and it does not 
> > > > > > > > check for 128-bit `long double` support.  That's why 
> > > > > > > > powerpc64le cannot offload to itself.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I'll review other points later so we can discuss them.  First, 
> > > > > > > > let's see if we can agree on this point.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > My point about ppc64le is:
> > > > > > > If the host code uses long double 128 bit long, tbe device long 
> > > > > > > double also must be 128 bit long. But if device does not support 
> > > > > > > 128bit FP type naturally, user cannot do any operations with it 
> > > > > > > except just load/stores.
> > > > > > > Forget about float128 type, we talk about 128bit long double here.
> > > > > > This patch adds new testing for powerpc64le.  Without the rest of 
> > > > > > this patch (and without the `expected-error` change), should that 
> > > > > > pass?  It does not for me.
> > > > > Just like I said before, it means that your device config does not 
> > > > > match the expected one. It means that either you specified incorrect 
> > > > > triple, or the device is not configured properly.
> > > > The triple is in the new test code.  Is it incorrect?
> > > > 
> > > > When you discussed device configuration earlier, you made a comment 
> > > > about 64 bit FP, and I couldn't find evidence of that anywhere.
> > > > 
> > > > When I explore the device config as you suggested earlier, as far as I 
> > > > can tell, the only issue here is that it claims powerpc64le does not 
> > > > support `__float128`, but the original logic in 
> > > > `Sema::checkOpenMPDeviceExpr` requires `__float128` by checking 
> > > > `Context.getTargetInfo().hasFloat128Type()`.
> > > Original ppc64le host reports that it supports 128bit float. The device 
> > > reports that it does not support it. It just means that the device has 
> > > different configuration than host. If yoh want the device to support 128 
> > > bit FP as the host, you need either to specify the device correctly, 
> > > orfix the target device configuration in the lib/Basic/Target if it does 
> > > not match the expected behavior. 
> > > Check the host init for ppc64le. It sets hasFloat128 to true. For some 
> > > reason, device target config does not set this flag and reports that it 
> > > does not support 128bit FP. 
> > > Original ppc64le host reports that it supports 128bit float.
> > 
> > > Check the host init for ppc64le. It sets hasFloat128 to true.
> > 
> > Doesn't appear to happen for me unless I add `-target-feature +float128` as 
> > a `-cc1` option, as some existing powerpc64le clang tests do.
> > 
> > @MaskRay, will powerpc64le set `HasFloat128=true` after your changes?
> > 
> This is what I meant! We just missed some special target config options for 
> the device. 
Thanks for the discussion.  I know what to do for the x86_64 case.  Others seem 
to be working on powerpc64le.  Maybe all architectures we care about (will 
eventually) correctly support `__float128`.  I'll abandon this patch.




CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64289/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64289



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to