martong marked 3 inline comments as done.
martong added a comment.
> Thank you for the explanation. I got the idea of this patch anyway, but it
> will be definitely useful for anyone digging into the code. Should we make it
> a comment for ImportPathTy?
Ok, I have added the explanation to `ImportPathTy` as a class comment.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:8682
+
+void ASTImporter::ImportPathTy::push(Decl *D) {
+ Nodes.push_back(D);
----------------
a_sidorin wrote:
> I think these definitions are small enough to move them into the class
> definitions.
Ok, I have made them in-class defined.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D62375/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D62375
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
