Szelethus added a comment. Woohoo! Thanks for everything, this is the most fun I've had working on this project! Let's wait for @xazax.hun to have the final say.
In D62883#1554494 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62883#1554494>, @NoQ wrote: > It should be pretty easy to implement, just add your new visitor to the list > of default visitors in `findValidReport()`. The thinking was to preserve this patch (roughly) in the state as the analyses were run. I also plan to patch CodeChecker so that it can diff two runs only only by bug report hash, but also by bug report length, which should make evaluation a lot easier. This may imply that I'll delay tracking control dependencies to all error nodes for later, as LLVM literally takes a day to analyze each time (and the sheer size of it gives invaluable data, which is why I plan doing it, but will check other projects too). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62883/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62883 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
