xbolva00 marked 3 inline comments as done. xbolva00 added inline comments.
================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:5609 +def warn_mul_in_bool_context : Warning< + "'*' in bool context, maybe you mean '&&'?">, + InGroup<IntInBoolContext>; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > I would appreciate seeing some motivating examples for this case, because it > seems like the `&&` suggestion is misleading more often than it's helpful in > the current test cases. > > Also, what is a "bool context"? Bool context - places where we expect boolean expressions. If you have idea for better terminology, I am happy to apply it. Yeah, I will remove “&&” suggestion.. ================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:5611 + InGroup<IntInBoolContext>; +def warn_left_shift_in_bool_context : Warning< + "'<<' in bool context, maybe you mean '<'?">, ---------------- Oh, inconsistency. I will use boolean context than bool context :) (if no suggestions) ================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:5625 + "evaluate to 'true'">, + InGroup<IntInBoolContext>; + ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > This one seems like it should be in the `TautologicalConstantCompare` group, > no? Yes, we could move it there. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D63082/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D63082 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits