nickdesaulniers added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Sema/warn-binary-conditional-expression-unused.c:8
+ a ? : ++b;
+ a ? a : ++b;
+ ++a ? : b; //expected-warning{{expression result unused}}
----------------
Note to other reviewers:
Whether or not we should warn on `a` here is another story and orthogonal to
this patch, which focuses on just fixing existing inconsistency between ternary
and gnu binary conditional that exists today.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63369/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63369
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
