tejohnson added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp:1345
Conf.RemarksPasses = CGOpts.OptRecordPasses;
- Conf.DwoPath = CGOpts.SplitDwarfFile;
+ Conf.DwoPath = CGOpts.SplitDwarfOutput;
switch (Action) {
----------------
aaronpuchert wrote:
> aaronpuchert wrote:
> > @pcc Your documentation for `DwoPath` suggests that this should be the
> > actual output filename. However, the test that you added together with this
> > line in rC333677 doesn't fail whatever garbage I write into that field
> > here. What can I add to that so that it fails when we don't do the right
> > thing here?
> @pcc Could you (or perhaps @tejohnson) comment on what the intended behavior
> is here, and how I can change the test so that it fails when I do the wrong
> thing? Is this the name of the file we write the split debug info to, or is
> it the value we use for the DW_AT_[GNU_]dwo_name attribute in the skeleton CU?
It is the name of the file the split debug info is written to. If you test by
changing the file name given to the -split-dwarf-file option in
test/CodeGen/thinlto-split-dwarf.c, make sure you clean up the old one in your
test output directory. When I tested it just now, it initially still passed
because I had an old one sitting in the output directory from a prior run. Once
I removed that it failed with the new name (without changing the corresponding
llvm-readobj invocation).
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59673/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59673
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
