jdoerfert reopened this revision. jdoerfert added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Why/Where did we decide to clobber the attribute list with "non-existent function names"? This seems to me like an ad-hoc implementation of the RFC that is currently discussed but committed before the discussion is finished. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60583/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60583 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
