craig.topper added a comment. In D62580#1521277 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62580#1521277>, @erichkeane wrote:
> A different (perhaps silly) question is why 'W' isn't sufficient? It > represents int64_t, which I wonder if is sufficient. I had asked in a separate conversation not to change the signatures outside of opencl. I believe W would use 'long' on 64-bit targets that aren't Windows or X32. The builtins are defined by gcc as well so I wanted to avoid making them different as much as possible. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D62580/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D62580 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
