sammccall added a comment. Still LG
I forgot to mention - it would be nice to clang-format the definition, what do you think? ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/XRefsTests.cpp:592 + )cpp", + {/*NamespaceScope=*/std::string("ns1::ns2"), + /*LocalScope=*/std::string(""), ---------------- kadircet wrote: > sammccall wrote: > > I think this should be "ns1::ns2::", as we use scope internally. > > This means we can simply concatenate parts to form a qname. > > > > For the current rendering, it's easy to strip :: > should it also be "::" for global namespace ? which would also result in > prefixing any symbol in global namespace with "::" when printing. We tend to use empty string for global namespace, and explicitly add it where we need it. Using :: for global causes as many problems as it solves (e.g. in C). ================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/XRefsTests.cpp:599 + /*Definition=*/"void foo()", + /*Type=*/llvm::None, + /*ReturnType=*/std::string("void"), ---------------- kadircet wrote: > sammccall wrote: > > It would be nice to add `void()` or `void (&)()` or so if it's easy. > > This is what `:YcmCompleter GetType` would show > just put the type without any parameter names, but I am not sure whether > users would want that. I believe people find current hover behavior a lot > more useful then just showing type(which is done by libclang) I don't think we should include it in the actual hover, but we can handle that in rendering (if it's a Function, don't print the type). It does seem odd not to include it in the structured API, but up to you. I thought specifically the `:GetType` might still be useful, but maybe not. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61497/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61497 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits