ymandel marked an inline comment as done.
ymandel added a comment.
Agreed on all the comments -- just one question:
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Tooling/Refactoring/Transformer.cpp:250
+ assert(!CommonKind.isNone() && "Cases must have compatible matchers.");
+ return DynTypedMatcher::constructVariadic(
+ DynTypedMatcher::VO_AnyOf, CommonKind, taggedMatchers("Tag",
Rule.Cases));
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> I wonder if there a better way to construct an `anyOf` matcher that can tell
> which case matched...
> It looks to be the reason for a more complicated interface on the transformer
> side, but I'm not sure there's a way out of it.
>
> Any ideas?
I don't quite follow. Which interface complication are you referring to? FWIW,
the reason the code here doesn't just use the anyOf() matches is that it
doesn't take a vector -- it only has a variadic form.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61335/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61335
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
