plotfi added a comment.
In D60974#1498240 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974#1498240>, @jakehehrlich
wrote:
> This shouldn't emit the .tbe format at all, the .tbe format is meant to be in
> near 1-1 correspondence with .so files, not with .o files. It has things like
> DT_NEEDED, and DT_SONAME related information that don't make sense for .o
> files for instance.
>
> If we put things under an --experimental flags, minimize what we add in the
> first patch, and try and make each additional field added need based, I'm ok
> with whatever being added to Clang assuming it doesn't interfere with other
> parts of the compiler.
So my latest diff addresses this. The schema resembles the tbe format but it is
marked with experimental and will not load with the current llvm-elfabi tool.
Should generate something resembling:
--- !experimental-tapi-elf-v1
Arch: x86_64
Symbols:
__Z16foo_default_visiii: { Type: Func }
__Z6fvih_1ii: { Type: Func }
__ZZ4fvihvE8fortytwo: { Type: Object, Size: 4 }
__Z12someWeakFuncv: { Type: Func, Weak: true }
...
How does this look to you?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
