rsmith added a comment. This seems reasonable to me, but I'll leave it to @klimek or someone else to judge whether the `isExplicit` / `hasExplicitSpecifier` approach is the right way to expose this functionality to matcher users.
Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61552/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61552 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
