keryell added a comment. In D61304#1485814 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61304#1485814>, @Anastasia wrote:
> In D61304#1485125 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61304#1485125>, @rjmccall wrote: > > > Presumably a similar rule would apply to thread-locals if you supported > > them. > > > We don't support them in OpenCL. But this is also about OpenCL extensions here anyway... Is thread-local not somewhat equivalent to work-item local, i.e. `__private`? But I am unsure we want to really handle this, while it is already an issue in the discussion about execution contexts in ISO C++... :-) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D61304/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D61304 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
