phosek marked an inline comment as not done.
phosek added a subscriber: rsmith.
phosek added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libunwind/CMakeLists.txt:190
if(LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR AND NOT APPLE)
- set(DEFAULT_INSTALL_PREFIX
lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}/clang/${CLANG_VERSION}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/)
- set(LIBUNWIND_LIBRARY_DIR
${LLVM_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_INTDIR}/clang/${CLANG_VERSION}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/lib${LIBUNWIND_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
+ set(LIBUNWIND_LIBRARY_DIR
${LLVM_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_INTDIR}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/c++)
+ set(LIBUNWIND_INSTALL_LIBRARY_DIR
lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX}/${LLVM_DEFAULT_TARGET_TRIPLE}/c++)
----------------
jdenny wrote:
> phosek wrote:
> > jdenny wrote:
> > > I naively assumed libunwind would have its own directory so it could be
> > > selected independently. Does this mean any library for C++ goes in c++?
> > We could do that, but I'm not sure if it's worth doing without a clear use
> > case? Do you know of any client that would want to consume libunwind
> > independently of other C++ libraries? I'm aware of Rust but they build
> > libunwind independently so there's no need for this.
> I'm afraid I have no idea. I'm not close enough to these libraries to be an
> adequate reviewer by myself. Another reviewer should probably take a look at
> the new version of the patch.
@EricWF @rsmith is this something you have an opinion on (or can you recommend
someone who might)?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59168
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
