mclow.lists added a comment. In D47358#1438929 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D47358#1438929>, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> Rebased. Added `_NOEXCEPT` to `upstream_resource()` and `options()` (this is > OK per [res.on.exception.handling]/5). That's fine, but then we should have a test for that. We have the macro `LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT` specifically for this purpose (libc++ - specific noexcept markings). CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D47358/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D47358 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
