javed.absar marked 2 inline comments as done.
javed.absar added inline comments.


================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td:9566
+def err_memtag_arg_null_or_pointer : Error<
+  "%0 argument must be a null or a pointer (%1 invalid)">;
+def err_memtag_any2arg_pointer : Error<
----------------
t.p.northover wrote:
> I think these diagnostics could do with a bit more context for consistency. 
> They seem to take "MTE builtin" for granted, whereas most Clang messages 
> mention what they're talking about.
> 
> I'm not saying "MTE builtin" is the best we can come up with, BTW, just that 
> something more would be nice.
I thought of doing that too , so can prefix these warnings with 'mte builtin' 
if that's what you meant. But the intrinsic called kind of names same thing 
(__arm_mte_..).


================
Comment at: lib/Headers/arm_acle.h:610-615
+#define __arm_mte_create_random_tag(__ptr, __mask)  __builtin_arm_irg(__ptr, 
__mask)
+#define __arm_mte_increment_tag(__ptr, __tag_offset)  
__builtin_arm_addg(__ptr, __tag_offset)
+#define __arm_mte_exclude_tag(__ptr, __excluded)  __builtin_arm_gmi(__ptr, 
__excluded)
+#define __arm_mte_get_tag(__ptr) __builtin_arm_ldg(__ptr)
+#define __arm_mte_set_tag(__ptr) __builtin_arm_stg(__ptr)
+#define __arm_mte_ptrdiff(__ptra, __ptrb) __builtin_arm_subp(__ptra, __ptrb)
----------------
t.p.northover wrote:
> Why are the builtin names so different from the ones exposed. GCC 
> compatibility? LLVM?
The builtin name (e.g. _mte_irg) is reflecting the instruction that implements 
the otherwise meaningful ACLE names  (mte_create_tag). Its just that the 
instruction names are sometimes cryptic (e.g. stg, ldg). I could change the 
names to __builtin_arm_create_tag etc and push the meaningful name -> insn 
level name to intrinsic level or further down but that would mean lots of name 
changes to current patch and tests. 


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60485/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60485



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to