bader accepted this revision.
bader added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaSYCL/device-attributes-on-non-sycl.cpp:5
+
+#if defined(EXPECT_WARNINGS)
+// expected-warning@+8 {{'sycl_kernel' attribute ignored}}
----------------
I think you can use `__SYCL_DEVICE_ONLY__` define instead.
================
Comment at: clang/test/SemaSYCL/device-attrubutes.cpp:8-11
+__attribute((sycl_kernel)) void foo();
+__attribute((sycl_device)) void foo1();
+[[clang::sycl_kernel]] void foo2();
+[[clang::sycl_device]] void foo3();
----------------
This duplicates clang/test/SemaSYCL/device-attributes-on-non-sycl.cpp.
Maybe it make sense to test case when both attributes are applied to the same
function.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60455/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60455
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
