rjmccall accepted this revision. rjmccall added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Hmm. Does this never impact code that's just using a locally-defined type within its scope? I guess if ADL is involved, unqualified lookup must have reached the scope of the innermost namespace, and so it would be searching that namespace anyway. In that case, I think I'm mollified that the source-compatibility risk is low and we should just unconditionally apply the new rule. LGTM. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60573/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60573 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
