MaskRay added a comment.

In D60409#1461579 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60409#1461579>, @phosek wrote:

> Our Mac builders have started failing after this change with the following:
>
>   [3145/3502] Building CXX object 
> tools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool/CMakeFiles/clangd.dir/ClangdMain.cpp.o
>   FAILED: 
> tools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool/CMakeFiles/clangd.dir/ClangdMain.cpp.o 
>   /b/s/w/ir/cache/goma/client/gomacc /b/s/w/ir/k/cipd/bin/clang++  
> -DCLANG_VENDOR="\"Fuchsia \"" -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE 
> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS 
> -Itools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool 
> -I/b/s/w/ir/k/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool 
> -I/b/s/w/ir/k/llvm-project/clang/include -Itools/clang/include 
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -Iinclude -I/b/s/w/ir/k/llvm-project/llvm/include 
> -I/b/s/w/ir/k/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool/.. 
> -Itools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool/.. -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden 
> -Werror=date-time -Werror=unguarded-availability-new -std=c++11 -Wall -Wextra 
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual 
> -Wmissing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wimplicit-fallthrough 
> -Wcovered-switch-default -Wno-noexcept-type -Wnon-virtual-dtor 
> -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wstring-conversion -fdiagnostics-color -fno-common 
> -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-nested-anon-types -O3 -gline-tables-only   -UNDEBUG 
>  -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -MD -MT 
> tools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool/CMakeFiles/clangd.dir/ClangdMain.cpp.o 
> -MF 
> tools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool/CMakeFiles/clangd.dir/ClangdMain.cpp.o.d 
> -o tools/clang/tools/extra/clangd/tool/CMakeFiles/clangd.dir/ClangdMain.cpp.o 
> -c /b/s/w/ir/k/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp
>   
> /b/s/w/ir/k/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/clangd/tool/ClangdMain.cpp:474:22: 
> error: use of undeclared identifier 'newXPCTransport'
>       TransportLayer = newXPCTransport();
>                        ^
>   1 error generated.
>
>
> I don't understand why since this change hasn't touched the failing line.


It has been fixed by rCTE358103 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rCTE358103>


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60409/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60409



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to