nicolas added a comment. In D60029#1448938 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60029#1448938>, @riccibruno wrote:
> Did you go over all the statements on `Stmt.h` systematically ? Yes. > You could also do the same thing for all of the statements/expressions in > `StmtCXX.h`, `Expr.h`, `ExprCXX.h`, and so on. I will go over those soon. I believe that `Expr.h` is mostly done. > Apart from this did you run `clang-format` on the patch ? I tried to stick to the style of the non-const functions, even when it was wrong. I will `clang-format` the next patch! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60029/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60029 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
