MaskRay marked an inline comment as done.
MaskRay added a comment.

In D59923#1446508 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59923#1446508>, @dblaikie wrote:

> What's the general motivation for this work/changes?


The current -gsplit-dwarf handling is a bit complex and the motivation is to 
make it less confused.

  -g0 -gsplit-dwarf => 2
  -gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fsplit-dwarf-inlining => 2
  -gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => 1 (before) 2 (after)

It is confusing because the composition of `-gmlt -gsplit-dwarf` is different 
from `-g0 -gsplit-dwarf` when `SplitDWARFInlining` is false.

>> -gmlt -gsplit-dwarf -fno-split-dwarf-inlining => special: 1 (before) 2 
>> (after)
> 
> This ^ is the only semantic change due to this refactoring?

This is the only semantic change.

> There's a desire to be able to compose gmlt+gsplit-dwarf, /if/ 
> -fno-split-dwarf-inlining is enabled. (for context, -fno-split-dwarf-inlining 
> is the default in Google's optimized builds, since split-dwarf-inlining was 
> never implemented in GCC & we didn't want to regress object size when 
> switching from GCC to Clang (& no one had complained about that missing 
> functionality))
> 
> So with -fno-split-dwarf-inlining, there's value in using gmlt with 
> gsplit-dwarf (it reduces the size of the .dwo files - reducing the 
> inputs/size of dwp, etc).
> 
> & it sounds like this change breaks that scenario?

Acknowledged the desire to compose `-gsplit-dwarf -gmlt 
-fno-split-dwarf-inlining`. After this patch, users should place `-gmplt` after 
`-gsplit-dwarf`.

In Bazel, the order of the command line options from left to right: feature 
flags < BUILD `copts=` < `--copt=`. So for targets specifying `-g0`/`-gmlt` in 
their `copts` / explict `--copts=` options, they will override `-gsplit-dwarf` 
added by the debug feature.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D59923/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D59923



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to