erik.pilkington added a comment. In D58797#1443411 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797#1443411>, @efriedma wrote:
> For that particular case, I think we could suppress the false positive using > DiagRuntimeBehavior. How many total false positives are we talking about, > and how many can the compiler statically prove are unreachable? Sure, that seems like a perfect fit, I added it in r357041. There are only two false-positives IIUC, and they're both immediately guarded by an `if (sizeof(x) == sizeof(y))`. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58797 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
