ilya-biryukov added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: jdoerfert. Another alternative we could consider would be collecting these fixes when producing the clang-tidy diagnostics. We won't show the diagnostics to the users if they have the check disabled, but we would stash the ranges and the textual fixes somewhere. I.e. I'm suggesting to reuse something closer to the mechanism of diagnostics fix-its, not the code tweak interfaces.
The advantages are: 1. keeping clang-tidy integration in one place, 2. no extra runs of ast matchers, all tidy checks will run during diagnostics. WDYT? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57943/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57943 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
