modocache added a comment.

I realize this isn't the correct solution, but would any would-be reviewers 
like to comment on the problem? Whether it's here or on the Bugzilla report 
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39287, as a newcomer to Clang modules I 
could use some help understanding whether this sort of behavior is expected, or 
if there are known workarounds. Any and all comments appreciated!


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58920/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58920



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D58920: [... Brian Gesiak via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to