mibintc added a comment. In D59307#1427663 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59307#1427663>, @jfb wrote:
> Thinking some more, this is really a silly gotcha in code. We should probably > follow what we're about to do with wg21.link/P1152 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/P1152> and ban chaining. Statement expressions > should therefore not be allowed to return `_Atomic`, `std::atomic`, nor > `volatile`. If the atomic load which is the value of the StmtExpr drops the atomic attribute then this would trivially be true, and there would be no need to add a restriction. According to what Clark says, once the value is loaded it's just data. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59307/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59307 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
