lebedev.ri added a comment. In D33029#1423944 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029#1423944>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> Adding the unit tests lets us see how this option will work in various cases, > it will let us understand that its not breaking anything else. > > I personally don't like to see revisions like this sit for 2 years with > nothing happening, I don't see anything wrong with this that would prevent it > going in so I don't understand whats blocking it?, > > if you had some tests and a release note I'd give it a LGTM (but as I've said > before I'm not the code owner, but someone wanting to address defects and add > capabilities. but I think we need to be able to move forward, people will > object soon enough if they don't like it.) > > Generally I don't understand why clang-format is so reluctant to change > anything, As such we don't have many people involved and getting anything > done (even defects) is extremely hard. > > It looks like you met the criteria, and reviewers have been given ample > opportunity to make an objection. the number of subscribers and like tokens > would suggest this is wanted, > > Please also add a line the in the release notes to say what you are adding. > In the absence of any other constructive input all we can do is follow the > guidance on doing a review, for what its worth I notice in the rest of LLVM > there seems to be a much larger amount of commits that go in even without a > review, I'm not sure what makes this area so strict, so reluctant to change > especailly when revisions do seem to be reviewed. I don't have any stake here, but i just want to point out that no tool (including clang-format) will ever support all the things all the people out there will want it to support. But every new knob is not just a single knob, it needs to work well with all the other existing knobs (and all of the combination of knob params), and every new knob after that. It's a snowball effect. Things can (and likely will, unless there is at least a *very* strict testing/quality policy (which is https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#adding-additional-style-options about)) get out of hand real quickly.. Just 2c. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D33029 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits