kallehuttunen added a comment. In D59103#1421875 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59103#1421875>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> Thank you for working on this! > > This looks questionable to me. > Is this based on some coding standard? > Are there any numbers on the false-positive rate of theck? It's not based on any coding standard, but is rather an attempt to eliminate one class of bugs (forgetting to update comparison operator when adding struct members) that I've encountered several times. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D59103/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D59103 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
