kristina added a comment. If the author is still missing at the end of next week, any objections to me resubmitting a similar patch that just implements `__FILE_NAME__` or `__BASE_NAME__` (Need a few more opinions here I guess, personally I think `__FILE_NAME__` makes more sense)?
I'll carve it out from my PP extension which simply looks for the last path separator (depending on the OS) and only renders the filename after it (or the whole path if there's no separator). No need for additional complications like depths etc. Since this idea was shot down last time, is it possible to get a few people to voice their opinion before I mark this as abandoned and carve out and clean up this from my PP extension and add proper tests for it? Would be appreciated, as this sort of thing is very useful (IMO) so would like to know if anyone is really against this proposal. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D17741/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D17741 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
