dexonsmith added a comment.
In D58548#1407331 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58548#1407331>, @greened wrote:
> +1. Is there any reason not to use "%4" in the definition?
>
> define i32 @f(i32, i32) {
> %3 = add i32 %0, %1
> br label %4
>
> %4:
> ret i32 %3
> }
>
>
> Maybe it creates an ambiguity in the grammar or something.
A `%` isn't used for labels that do have names, so David's approach seems
consistent.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58548/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58548
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
