zturner added a comment. In D57896#1406401 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896#1406401>, @probinson wrote:
> In D57896#1406353 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896#1406353>, @MyDeveloperDay > wrote: > > > I can't argue with anything you say.. but I guess to reinforce your point > > introducing what is effectively a 3rd style would likely cause even more > > jarring... > > > Zach isn't introducing a new style, the style already exists and is > consistently used by what I think is our 3rd largest subproject. It happens > not to be used at all by the two largest subprojects, but those subprojects > already aren't consistent with themselves. > I would not mind a more concerted effort to migrate to whatever style we > pick, which was notably lacking last time around. Then the jarring > inconsistencies would go away, and we could all get back to complaining about > content and not style. If I read the post correctly, it was actually agreeing with me (because it said "to reinforce your point...". Meaning that something such as `lowerCaseCamel` would be the third style being referred to, while my proposal keeps the number of styles to 2. But, maybe I read it wrong. If I read it right, then obviously I agree :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D57896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
