phosek added a comment. In D58317#1400223 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58317#1400223>, @smeenai wrote:
> I'm not entirely happy with the name clang-dev-headers, and am open to > suggestions. It's unfortunate clang-headers was already taken for something > different, but renaming that target or increasing its scope seems bad for > existing users. Other possibilities I thought of include > clang-tooling-headers, though that might be confused with the headers for > libTooling specifically, and clang-library-headers. I'm open to suggestions. We could consider renaming `clang-headers` to e.g. `clang-resource-headers` and then reusing the name which would match `llvm-headers`. What do you think about that? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58317/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58317 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
