to-miz added a comment. I understand that adding new options adds costs to the development of clang-format, but there was a feature request and there is interest for this option. As for the cost to the development, there already exists PPDIS_AfterHash. All I did was make the changes introduced in that patch a bit more general and removed the hard coded assumption that there are no indents before a hash at a couple of places. I would argue the cost of development of this new option is roughly the same as it is with the existence of PPDIS_AfterHash itself. PPDIS_BeforeHash seems like a natural extension of the changes introduced by PPDIS_AfterHash.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D52150/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D52150 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
