arphaman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp:271
+  } else if (!openFile) {
+    // Since we didn't return early after getStatValue() call the file exists.
+    fillRealPathName(&UFE, InterndFileName);
----------------
jkorous wrote:
> arphaman wrote:
> > I don't really understand what this comment is trying to say. Can you 
> > rephrase it?
> Please see the above comment (line 214).
> 
> What I meant is that it's guaranteed that the file exists as we would have 
> returned otherwise. Does that make sense?
> 
> Any suggestion how to rephrase the comment? (Or shall I just remove it?)
The throwback here is unnecessary. You can just say that RealFilePath should 
still be filled even for `stat`s.


================
Comment at: unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp:357
+
+  const FileEntry *file = manager.getFile(Path);
+
----------------
NIT: You might want to make `OpenFile = false` explicit to emphasize the stat.


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58213/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58213



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to