mehdi_amini added a comment. In D58157#1396824 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157#1396824>, @rnk wrote:
> And, this change really just keeps us at parity with what we had with svn. > We can always revisit the decision to merge the clang tools into clang. This > particular change just gives us more options, today. Sure, looks fine. The cost of reversing it isn't that high either (updating a bunch of bot configurations). It'd still be nice to identify the end goal with most cfe people (i.e. even if you land this right now, discussing the desired layout in the monorepo) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
