aaron.ballman added a reviewer: rsmith. aaron.ballman added a comment. If I'm following along properly, it sounds like we want to disable this warning largely because it can appear in header files attempting to declare the functions in question -- but I wonder why those diagnostics are happening in the first place. It seems like the warning is still useful when it triggers outside of that situation, no?
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:1974 + + // Generally we emit a warning that the declaration requires the appropriate + // header. ---------------- Generally -> Generally, Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D58091/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D58091 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
