NoQ added a comment.

Sounds reasonable, but it also sounds like something that should be 
reproducible on the upstream clang. Do you have a code snippet that causes the 
problematic AST to appear? Even if we don't have the false positive up here in 
upstream, Is it something we can test via `-analyzer-display-progress | 
FileCheck` or with the help of the analysis order checker or something like 
that?


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57890/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57890



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D57890: [analyzer]... Gábor Horváth via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D57890: [anal... Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to