aaron.ballman added a comment.

Thank you for working on this! It looks like we did have to add the new AST 
node after all, but the changes seem pretty good. Should anything be updated in 
the AST dumper for this (such as printing whether a Stmt is a value-producing 
statement or not)?



================
Comment at: include/clang/AST/Stmt.h:1598-1602
+  const Expr *getExprStmt() const;
+  Expr *getExprStmt() {
+    const ValueStmt *ConstThis = this;
+    return const_cast<Expr*>(ConstThis->getExprStmt());
+  }
----------------
We typically implement this in reverse, where the non-const version holds the 
actual implementation and the const version performs a `const_cast`.


================
Comment at: include/clang/Parse/Parser.h:374
+  /// a statement expression and builds a suitable expression statement.
+  StmtResult handleExprStmt(ExprResult E, WithinStmtExpr IsInStmtExpr);
 
----------------
Rather than passing around `IsInStmtExpr` to a bunch of parser APIs, would it 
make more sense to add an RAII object that sets some state on `Parser` to test 
it? The proliferation of arguments seems unfortunate given how much of a corner 
case statement expressions are.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:13319
   if (!Compound->body_empty()) {
-    Stmt *LastStmt = Compound->body_back();
-    LabelStmt *LastLabelStmt = nullptr;
-    // If LastStmt is a label, skip down through into the body.
-    while (LabelStmt *Label = dyn_cast<LabelStmt>(LastStmt)) {
-      LastLabelStmt = Label;
-      LastStmt = Label->getSubStmt();
-    }
-
-    if (Expr *LastE = dyn_cast<Expr>(LastStmt)) {
-      // Do function/array conversion on the last expression, but not
-      // lvalue-to-rvalue.  However, initialize an unqualified type.
-      ExprResult LastExpr = DefaultFunctionArrayConversion(LastE);
-      if (LastExpr.isInvalid())
-        return ExprError();
-      Ty = LastExpr.get()->getType().getUnqualifiedType();
-
-      if (!Ty->isDependentType() && !LastExpr.get()->isTypeDependent()) {
-        // In ARC, if the final expression ends in a consume, splice
-        // the consume out and bind it later.  In the alternate case
-        // (when dealing with a retainable type), the result
-        // initialization will create a produce.  In both cases the
-        // result will be +1, and we'll need to balance that out with
-        // a bind.
-        if (Expr *rebuiltLastStmt
-              = maybeRebuildARCConsumingStmt(LastExpr.get())) {
-          LastExpr = rebuiltLastStmt;
-        } else {
-          LastExpr = PerformCopyInitialization(
-              InitializedEntity::InitializeStmtExprResult(LPLoc, Ty),
-              SourceLocation(), LastExpr);
-        }
-
-        if (LastExpr.isInvalid())
-          return ExprError();
-        if (LastExpr.get() != nullptr) {
-          if (!LastLabelStmt)
-            Compound->setLastStmt(LastExpr.get());
-          else
-            LastLabelStmt->setSubStmt(LastExpr.get());
-          StmtExprMayBindToTemp = true;
-        }
+    if (ValueStmt *LastStmt = dyn_cast<ValueStmt>(Compound->body_back())) {
+      if (Expr *Value = LastStmt->getExprStmt()) {
----------------
`const auto *`


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:13355
+  // a bind.
+  ImplicitCastExpr *Cast = dyn_cast<ImplicitCastExpr>(E);
+  if (Cast && Cast->getCastKind() == CK_ARCConsumeObject)
----------------
`auto *`


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57984/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57984



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to