TomTan added a comment.

In D57915#1389560 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57915#1389560>, @lebedev.ri wrote:

> In D57915#1389549 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57915#1389549>, @TomTan wrote:
>
> > Added the tests back. Clang IR should not lower these to bswap calls 
> > because they are global library functions. It might be slower to make the 
> > call to library function than bswap, but this is the same for other 
> > architectures supported by Windows. And just redefine global library 
> > function triggers link error in some scenarios.
>
>
> I think there is some deeper reasoning is being omitted here.
>  //Why// does the fact that those are "global library functions" bans clang 
> from lowering them into IR?
>  (and thus, "prevents" LLVM form doing optimizations)


The current issue could be caused by the implementation of comdat selection in 
LLD as below which provides more strict conflict check than MSVC link does.

These `_bytewap_*` in `intrin.h` were not intended as optimization, instead, it 
is expected to be consistent with declarations in `stdlib.h`. For optimization, 
it makes sense to enable it for all architectures supported by Windows, and 
make sure it works with LLD.

https://github.com/llvm-mirror/lld/blob/b6584c3fab115aa46dad27681af7eb3d4e5d2b35/COFF/InputFiles.cpp#L494


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57915/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57915



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to