efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp:347
+ LabelAndGotoScopes[S] = ParentScope;
+ Jumps.push_back(S);
+ }
----------------
This doesn't look right; I think we need to add it to IndirectJumps instead.
This probably impacts a testcase like the following:
```
struct S { ~S(); };
int f() {
{
S s;
asm goto(""::::BAR);
return 1;
}
BAR:
return 0;
}
```
(gcc currently accepts this and skips running the destructor, but I'm pretty
sure that's a bug.)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56571/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56571
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
